Schizophrenia should be dropped, experts say
LONDON - Mental health experts called on Monday for the term schizophrenia to be dropped, saying it has no scientific validity, is imprecise and stigmatizing.
"It is a harmful concept," said Marius Romme, a visiting professor of social psychiatry at the University of Central England in Birmingham.
He added that symptoms such as delusions, hearing voices and hallucinations are not the results of the illness but may be reactions to traumatic and troubling events in life.
Speaking at a news conference, Richard Bentall, a professor of clinical psychology at the University of Manchester, said the concept of schizophrenia is scientifically meaningless.
"It groups together a whole range of different problems under one label — the assumption is that all of these people with all of these different problems have the same brain disease," he added.
Schizophrenia affects about 1 percent of people in the United States and Britain. Treatments such as atypical antipsychotic drugs focus on eliminating the symptoms. But the drugs can cause side effects such as weight gain, an increased risk of diabetes and sexual dysfunction.
Paul Hammersley of the University of Manchester who recently helped launch The Campaign for the Abolition of the Schizophrenia Label (CASL), said there is no agreement on the cause of the illness or its treatment.
CASL argues that the term schizophrenia is extremely damaging to those to whom it is applied and implies unpredictability, being dangerous, unable to cope and someone in need of life-long treatment. "IT IS LIKE CANCELING SOMEONE'S LIFE," said Hammersley. "We generally believe this word has to go. Other psychiatrists agree that schizophrenia is an unsatisfactory term that conveys bizarreness but they are concerned that discarding the term could lead to problems classifying patients with psychosis.
"If we don't have some way of distinguishing between patients, then those with bipolar disorder or obsessional disorder would be mixed up with those currently diagnosed as having schizophrenia and might receive treatments wholly inappropriate for them," said Robin Murray, a professor of psychiatry at the Institute of Psychiatry in London.
He suggested replacing the term schizophrenia with the label dopamine dysregulation disorder, which he said more accurately reflects what is happening in the brain of someone who is psychotic.
Comments
-
if someone is not there to listen to you the voices take the place of what we would express on our own and for that matter its a matter of always i think youll agree getting it in line with the other persons will so we know what voice to listen to and there are ways to tell if someone is really listneing to you i know it doesnt alway make an impression therefore if something is wrong with it and that person is best helped with therapy or fun becuase the fact is ignorance in people is no virtue its like reading a book with no content and how might one know that he is learning unless he applies himslef to others or other activites or faces the facts hes in control its a matter not to debate i dare say you might learn to enjoy it rather than comprmise the truth or trust in the relationship which we note is an earliler sign of a stemming promlem if people dont keep in memory what we learn as children then all of our words are made as nothign as we get older that seems friendly enough so you see it works against the persons making him a victim rather than a trusted friend and